Says the great Drayton Bird in his email this morning:

“On-line marketing is just accelerated direct marketing.”

He’s right. It’s therefore more important than ever that your marketers are properly trained: it’s harder to keep the rubber on the road in an F1 car than in your daily driver. Yet, the marketing world has been hijacked by charlatans, who speed around the track recklessly, crashing our valuable brands into the Armco.

When discussing the seven ways to make marketing great again, Mark Ritson said:

“Don’t listen to the f****ing philistines or we all will lose. The anti-intellectual movement cannot win here.”

Watch Ritson in action here, as well as the appalling advice given by a famous marketing charlatan.

Takeaway: Practice proper marketing. Get trained. Understand the entire discipline. And win.

Posted on Thursday, 27 July 2017 11:14 am by markpilip | Comments Off on “Digital” is Just Accelerated Direct Marketing

Purple Cow – where’s the beef ?

Posted on Wednesday, 26 July 2017 10:05 am by markpilip

I spent a few minutes yesterday reading some of the blog posts from Byron Sharp (the author of the MUST read “How Brands Grow”) and came across this post, which I share with the following comments:

1. 84% of everything is mediocre or worse (i.e. <= +1 std deviation from the mean).
2. Therefore it's unlikely that everything I read about "incredible" teams, "awesome" products etc. is true.
3. We are not very precise in our use of the English language.

ByronSharp's avatarMarketing Science

There is a small, nay large, industry that makes claims like:

“consumer behaviour has changed radically”
“marketing doesn’t work anymore”

And yet then presents nothing more than a repackaging of the orthodoxy.

For example, Seth Godin’s “Purple Cow” says that marketing is “broken”, that advertising could once turn a sow’s ear into a silk purse but has lost its effectiveness due to clutter and ad avoidance. This is spite of research that shows advertising continues to perform as well as ever (1) (2) (3).

So says Seth, companies need to adopt his radical new marketing strategy which is…wait for it…. to produce remarkable products and market them in remarkable ways. Wow. I don’t remember my old Uni textbooks saying anything like this, they only used words like “great” not “remarkable”. What a step forward in thinking.

Seth’s a great story teller, his books are entertaining. But it is a sad…

View original post 214 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Purple Cow – where’s the beef ?

Do your DSP(s) have any rebate agreements with ad exchanges or anybody else?

If not, great! Is that explicitly laid out in the contracts you have with them, and do you have full audit rights? And if not, why not?

Hat tip to The Programmatic Advisory.

Posted on Thursday, 20 July 2017 7:07 am by markpilip | Comments Off on DSP Transparency

Try this the next time you talk about digital advertising with your digital marketing team and/or your agency. Print out a page with your ad on it. Put it on the whiteboard and give your buying team a marker and ask them to draw out exactly how that particular ad showed up on that particular website and why. By that, I mean all the names of the ad tech and martech players involved. No looking anything up.

Bet they can’t do it on the fly.
puentes1_718

Take a look at this diagram, published today by Rebel AI CEO Manny Puentes in AdExchanger, discussing Ads.txt.

Read the article on his take on the shortcomings of the ads.txt solution. See if you can make any sense of it.

Feel better now about your programmatic buying?

Posted on Wednesday, 19 July 2017 12:41 pm by markpilip | Comments Off on More on Ads.txt

Before You Worry About Match Rates…

Posted on Wednesday, 19 July 2017 9:12 am by markpilip

Screen Shot 2017-07-19 at 8.23.21 AMMatch rates are critical to maximizing the effectiveness of your digital campaigns. Once you’ve decided on who you want to target, you’ve got to  reach as many of them as effectively as possible with the right media.

But before you get bogged down in match rate discussions, the more important strategic work needs to have been done up front. Have you (or somebody):

  • Defined the universe precisely?
  • Segmented the universe into MECE groups?
  • Estimated LTV/CLV for those segments and, therefore, the allowable?
  • Decided which segments to select, suppress, and ignore?
  • Developed messaging for each segment, including pricing and offer?
  • Selected media appropriate to each segment, considering all media types?

If you haven’t, the match rate to your onboarder or from your onboarder to DMP or DMP to publisher won’t matter one bit. You’ll be going after the wrong people, without a proper strategy and—by definition–with incorrect tactics.

If you’re a digital marketing manager and have been given targets to go after, ask questions. Be convinced that somebody did the work before you get into the detailed channel-level tactics. Same thing if you’re an agency. Ask questions about that brief.

Once the strategic work has been done, then worry about match rates. A good article to help you think about match rates is here.

And what’s the best key on which to base all your marketing strategy, including digital? It has nothing to do with cookies, device IDs, pub IDs or any of that. It’s good old name and address.

Takeaway: Never delve into tactics without understanding the mission and the strategy to accomplish the mission. And win.

Posted in digital marketing, Direct Response, Marketing, Media, Strategy, Tactics | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Before You Worry About Match Rates…

Digital Media: As Memorable as Kenny G?

Posted on Monday, 17 July 2017 9:07 am by markpilip

Screen Shot 2017-07-17 at 8.45.22 AMThe smooth jazz radio format wasn’t as popular as thought. When Arbitron changed from paper diaries to portable people meters (PPM) about ten years ago, broadcasters learned that people didn’t do what the paper diaries said they did.

With good data from PPM devices, broadcasters learned that people flipped stations more than reported previously. The result was that the smooth jazz format was killed. What’s next?

As Bob Lefsetz said the other day, “Big band music died, why can’t rock?”

What happens if a PPM was invented for digital media? Would all the view-through attribution currently applied by our multi-touch attribution models go away? I think so. Maybe we’ll get to the bottom of the rampant fraud and B.S. in the digital ecosystem.

A kind of PPM already exists in the UK, with Lumen Research’s digital panel.  I think a lot of the programmatic hype is nothing more than smooth jazz: hardly viewed for even a second and about as memorable.

You might think you’re buying rockstar impressions. You’re really getting Kenny G.

Takeaway: If your agency/platform/publisher pushes back on doing Lumen-style measurement, ask “cui bono?” And win.

Posted in Analysis, Data, Media | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Digital Media: As Memorable as Kenny G?

Nobody’s Talking About This ads.txt Problem

Posted on Monday, 10 July 2017 9:16 am by markpilip

As a media buyer, I find myself scratching my head about the IAB’s ads.txt initiative.

It’s a good thing, of course. Knowing that somebody selling advertising inventory to you is actually authorized to sell that impression to you is important.

The problem that nobody’s talking about: The digital advertising world created a dirty, disorganized, fraud-filled world. Almost nothing is what it seems to be, whether it’s the audience, the viewability, and the clicks. And even, it turns out, whether you’re buying impressions on the site you think you are.

The question is why does the ads.txt initiative even need to exist? And what is really being done to clean this up?

Posted in Marketing, Media, planning | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Nobody’s Talking About This ads.txt Problem

We all think we know what an auction is. We conjure up the sound of the gavel falling to the high bidder and the horses being led away into the winner’s transporters.

In theory, programmatic auctions for digital advertising should be similar. Maybe they’re second-price, but we think that aside from the technology we understand the rules.

Or do we?

This article in Digiday about the shenanigans in programmatic auctions is fascinating. Here’s another set of questions for your agency:

  1. For each network that we’re buying on, what’s the auction model?
  2. Prove it
  3. Warranty it

Something I just noticed: I’m filing all articles about programmatic buying in my Evernote “Ad Fraud” notebook. Hmm.

Posted on Friday, 30 June 2017 3:05 pm by markpilip | Comments Off on When Auctions Aren’t Auctions

Your Mission and Vision are Lousy

Posted on Friday, 30 June 2017 7:40 am by markpilip

I was talking about company mission and vision statements with Paresh Shah, a good and smart friend of mine. During the discussion, he gave me a simple rule to see if your mission was good or not:

“Write out the exact opposite of your company mission or position. If nobody wouldn’t buy the opposite, your mission or vision sucks.”

How simple is that? But it’s true. Most vision/mission/whatever task forces come up with a namby-pamby list of inoffensive terms. We’re scared that some potential buyer might be scared off by a word, so we get a bleah vanilla mission.

Nobody hates vanilla, but nobody likes it all that much either. Certainly, nobody goes to the mat for vanilla.

Try it with your company, product, or institution. Did you get vanilla? Fix it.

P.S. During the discussion, we quickly wrote a mission statement for a assisted living facility centered around sex, drugs, and loud rock and roll. (I can’t share the exact wording on this, a family-oriented blog.) Many people, perhaps most, would decline to bring their parents there.  They might even think the benefits of such a place are highly illegal. We, on the hand, thought we’d enjoy our golden years there and we don’t believe we’re alone. A new business opportunity presents itself and it would work like crazy.

Posted in Branding, Marketing, Philosophy, Product Development, Strategy | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Your Mission and Vision are Lousy

Worst Ad Ever?

Posted on Tuesday, 27 June 2017 9:13 am by markpilip

eyetestad-222x300.pngI’ve been reading a lot from the great Drayton Bird recently. He points to this ad as possibly the worst ad ever and I can’t disagree. It might be for an insurance company, as I can make out the word “insurer” somewhere on the 20/10 vision line. But who’s to know? Nobody would spend more than a second glancing at an eye test before moving on.

Who writes an ad without a headline?

Screen Shot 2017-06-27 at 9.03.31 AM

Ling’s Cars (UK)

On the other hand, this “monstrosity” might be one of the best websites ever. All it does is sell car leases.

Takeaway: Don’t forget the rules. And don’t forget to sell. And win

Posted in Direct Response, Marketing, Tactics | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Worst Ad Ever?